Hierarchical observation(HO) represents one of the three mechanisms of disciplinary power(DP), in which power affects the soul and trains individuals(170). According to Foucault, discipline operates through surveillance so that one is being coerced through constant observation, without the need for physical violence(170-171). While the observer is invisible, the subjects are visible. This emphasis on the subjects, exemplifies descending individualism, compared to the emphasis on the rulers in sovereign power. Since one never knows when one is being watched, fear and control become internalized, so that appropriate conduct is constantly maintained. Moreover, this constant observation is conducted by “relays” of surveyors that are hierarchically organized through reciprocal power relations induced both from lower to higher ranks, and from higher to lower ranks(174,176).
In addition to the consequence of paranoia and appropriate conduct, HO allows DP to be permanently infused in all micro-elements of society(177). This power is also “silent” in that people are not even consciously aware of their complete subjection to its power. The pyramidal structure of HO also “increases [an institution’s] efficiency” as specialized procedures are incorporated and work together(176).
The increased efficiency in DP, through HO, is also evident in Durkheim’s theory of organic solidarity(OS). Durkheim’s emphasis on the individualism within collective conscious in OS, parallels Foucault’s concept of descending individualism. However, while for Foucault, DP rehabilitates and trains individuals, restitutive laws in OS restores order. Furthermore, for Foucault, HO represents a mechanism of coercion. In comparison, forced DL is absent in Durkheim’s theory, as individuals are happy to fulfill their natural talents.
The architecture of the Oakland Ice Center represents a means of HO. Foucault describes the architecture of HO to “render[s] visible those who are inside it” so that rules are obeyed and power is internalized(172). Similarly, the oval shaped rink is enclosed by plexiglass, allowing all skaters to be made visible. The bleachers that surround the rink also allow the onlookers at the top of the bleachers to be able to “see everything”(173). This visibility enforces skaters to follow the rule of skating counter clockwise. HO is also present, as the managers supervise the guards on the ice, who observe the skaters.
Although Foucault analyzes power through visibility, he does not recognize that power is heightened when one is aware of being consistently watched. Although in practice, figure skaters may be observed, they are not afraid to make mistakes, redo their program, and experiment with choreography. However, in competition, skaters are being officially judged must perform their best. Instead of all skaters practicing at the same time, in competition, judges and audience members’ attention are fixed on one skater. Visibility is further heightened as judges are able to rewind, slow down, and pause every body position in recorded videos. The skater’s awareness of being consistently observed in competition is exemplified through elaborate dresses and costumes, compared to the simple apparel worn in practice. Therefore, Foucault does not acknowledge the degrees of visibility and the increase in power as one becomes more paranoid of being observed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Mina, I just wanted to reproduce my question to you on your blog (even though you already excellently answered it!):
ReplyDelete"Mina, I really liked your post on figure skating and the discussion of hierarchical observation! My question relates to Conrad’s brilliant comment today about how certain disciplinary mechanisms do not work 'perfectly.'
So, while you discuss how the skating rink functions according to hierarchical observation, how does it function imperfectly? How does the rink defy the Foucault’s analysis of how hierarchical observation works? Does the skating rink complicate Foucault’s analysis?"
I really enjoyed how you connected ice skating with hierarchical observation because in a way one can associate hierarchical observation with any performance, whether it be ice skating or acting on a stage. Performers are being closely watched and observed. The media itself can be seen as hierarchical observation for famous people. Celebrities are constantly being watched by the paparazzi and they must be careful or else they will be exposed for doing something that is not socially acceptable.
ReplyDeleteTo be more specific to your example of ice skating, I can definitely see how you can interpret the situation as hierarchical observation but I think it can also be interpreted in terms of normalization. Ice skaters are doing what they are supposed to do because they understand the norms that are expected of them, not necessarily because of hierarchical observation.
to laurice's comment:
ReplyDeletewoah...i like the example of celebrities being hierarchically watched through the media. nice!
haha...i was thinking about writing about normalization. i agree that skaters are following the norms expected of them on the ice. In competition - the norm is to fulfill all the technical requirements (i.e.# of rotation in each jump) and they are examined according to these norms. But I think the power of normalization is further strenghtened by HO.